Apple Loses in Short-Term, Wins in the Long Run with Smart Litigation Risk Management Strategy

Yesterday, Apple Co. announced a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) where it would refund at least $32.5 million largely to parents who were victims of excessive in-app purchase by their kids.  In some cases, kids racked up thousands of dollars of purchases in iPad and iPhone games. The Washington Post has the story:

http://tinyurl.com/mbj4vrq

Now, Apple had a good argument that parents should be responsible for the actions of their children.  But, Apple made the smart litigation risk management decision.  Instead of advancing a legally correct but unpopular position, they agreed to pay a nominal amount to victims and are using this settlement for positive p.r. (Apple is now gushing about its protection of children).

When a company can remove emotion from the equation, they can make a sound business decision. Sometimes, the right answer is “fight to the death.”  Other times, the right answer is settlement and a positive public relations campaign.  As one of the most successful companies in the world, Apple made the smart litigation risk management decision.

https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/scra/

I recently came across a situation where a collection company was coming after a service member of the US Army for a bad debt and threatening a lawsuit. But, the collection company should have known better. The Service Members Civil Relief Act prohibits many financial-related claims and lawsuits against service members while they are on active duty. If you know someone who is proudly serving this country, but is being harassed by a debt collector, let them know that they don’t have to stand for it.

More information can be found at: https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/scra/